Such a beautiful pale colour, like a ghost with a touch of rouge on its cheek. I don’t think I have ever known a wine as pale as this to have so much aroma and flavour, it’s truly astonishing. Rosehip and peony kick things off, followed by orange rind, raspberry tea and incense. It’s as ethereal and delicate as a Chambolle-Musigny and has a struck flint, mineral character that only adds to the impression that this is a Cotes de Nuits red, but it ain’t, it comes from vineyards about 3 hours north of Los Angeles. Amazing! 12.5% alc. Only 11 barrels made. 15% whole clusters and matured in 15% new oak. Drink now-2029.

But, hey! Don’t take my word for it, I’m just a simple human being. This is what our future overlord, ChatGPT, suggested when I asked it to create a tasting note:

“Chanin Los Alamos Pinot Noir 2020 is an excellent wine that is sure to impress even the most discerning wine connoisseur. On the nose, this Pinot Noir exhibits alluring aromas of ripe cherries, blackberries, and plums, along with subtle hints of vanilla and spice. The aroma is further enriched by a subtle earthiness and a hint of smoke.

On the palate, the wine is silky and elegant, with a medium body and a lively acidity that provides a refreshing lift. The flavours of black cherry, raspberry, and plum are beautifully balanced with a touch of oak and a hint of clove, resulting in a wine that is complex and well-rounded. The tannins are supple and velvety, adding a touch of structure to the wine and ensuring a long, smooth finish.

Overall, Chanin Los Alamos Pinot Noir 2020 is an outstanding example of California Pinot Noir, showcasing the best of the region's terroir and winemaking techniques. It is a wine that can be enjoyed now, but also has the potential to age gracefully for several years, allowing the complex flavours to develop and mature over time. Highly recommended for anyone looking for a truly exceptional Pinot Noir.”

Hmmmm. Perhaps there will be a place for wine writers in the robot future after all, because that, my friends, is inaccurate gibberish, although, to be fair, it’s better than James Suckling.